Two open blank books set slightly apart on a dark wooden desk with one blank card between them, cosmic fire-rings in a stone window

Tool Alpha

The Contradiction Desk

Claimed Bible contradictions, stated the way they circulate, each with one diagnosis and the evidence for it: the Hebrew, the Greek, the manuscripts.

God tempted Abraham, and God tempts no one

The King James says God did tempt Abraham. James says God tempts no one. One English verb is doing two different jobs.

Translation splitGenesis
Genesis 22:1

Genesis 22:1, in every translation this tool compares.

First, in plain English

The real question: can God test a person without tempting him, or is that a line drawn after the fact? The coach said he was going to try the new player, and the player's mother said that coach never tries to make anyone fail. One word, used twice. Are they talking about the same thing?

The claim

Genesis 22:1 in the King James says God did tempt Abraham, then tells him to offer Isaac. James 1:13 says God cannot be tempted with evil and tempts no one. One verse says God did the thing the other says he never does.

What is actually going on

The Hebrew verb in Genesis 22:1 is nissah. The site's translation entry on the verse glosses it as test, try or prove, and Strong's definition, as carried in the site's word study data, is to test, with prove, try and tempt among the King James renderings. The CSB Study Bible says it means to prove the quality of something, not to entice to do wrong. Modern versions read tested, as the ESV Study Bible's note on the verse shows. James wrote in Greek, and the ESV Study Bible notes that his verb for tempted is the verb form of the noun he uses for trial a verse earlier; the context, it says, shows two different senses. So each language has one word that covers both testing and luring, and the English of 1611 used tempt for both. Tempt now means only the second.

King James

And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, here I am.

The same translation has James 1:13 say God "neither tempteth he any man". The site's translation entry puts the clash down to English drift: tempt was an accurate word in 1611 and has since narrowed.
The skeptic case

The Skeptic's Annotated Bible files Genesis 22:1 under the question "Has God ever tempted anyone?" against James 1:13, and adds 2 Samuel 24:1, where God moves David to number the people, and the line in the Lord's Prayer about not being led into temptation. Its comment on the prayer is that it "wouldn't be necessary if God never tempts anyone." At full strength the case is about more than a verb: God arranges situations in which people can fail, and calling that a test does not change what it is.

The harmonizing case

The ESV Study Bible says testing must be clearly distinguished from tempting: God tests the commitment of people, as at Exodus 15:25 and 16:4, but tempts no one to do evil. The NIV Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible locates the difference in motive. Jewish texts, it says, distinguished God testing people in love and seeking their good from Satan testing them to make them fall. MacArthur reads James the same way: one Greek word gives trials in verses 2 to 12 and tempted in verse 13, and the circumstance either strengthens the believer or becomes a solicitation to evil, depending on how he responds.

What the diagnosis does not settle

The diagnosis explains the English. It does not answer the skeptic's wider point. Hebrew and Greek both use one word for the test and the lure, so the original still asks what God intends by a test a person might fail, and the harmonizing case answers from motive, which the verb alone does not supply. 2 Samuel 24:1, set beside 1 Chronicles 21:1, is a separate claim and is not settled here.

What this is not

Not a claim that the King James mistranslated. In its own century tempt could mean put to the test. The English moved; the Hebrew did not.

Read in Why Do Bible Translations Differ?
  • {"u":"https:\/\/jayms.com\/bible-study-tools-2\/bible-translation-differences\/genesis-22-1\/","n":"Genesis 22:1","s":"God did tempt Abraham. The Hebrew verb means tested or proved, not enticed toward evil.","r":"Genesis 22:1"}
Sources
  1. ESV Study Bible, ePub edition (Crossway), notes on Genesis 22:1 and James 1:13
  2. CSB Study Bible, note on Genesis 22:1-2
  3. NIV Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible, note on James 1:13
  4. The MacArthur Study Bible (ESV), notes on Genesis 22:1 and James 1:13
  5. Why Do Bible Translations Differ? (jayms.com tool data), entry genesis-22-1
  6. Bible Word Study (jayms.com tool data), Strong's H5254
  7. The Skeptic's Annotated Bible, Has God ever tempted anyone?, https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/tempted_by_God.html
  8. King James Version, Genesis 22:1 and James 1:13

All claims

Favorites
Timelines
Command Centers
Search and Lookup
Printables
Facebook X Subscribe