H622

• {"n":"Genesis 30:24","s":"She called his name Joseph, saying, the LORD shall add to me another son. A second, earlier pun on the same name used a different root, for taking away.","u":"https:\/\/jayms.com\/bible-study-tools-2\/bible-translation-differences\/#id=genesis-30-24","r":"Genesis 30:24","b":[{"l":"How modern translations read it","t":"Every version reads Joseph as a transliterated name, with the explanation the LORD shall add to me another son translated in full, but the earlier, different pun two verses before, God hath taken away my reproach, is not shown to be connected to the name at all."},{"l":"First, in plain English","t":"Imagine a name explained twice in the same conversation, once because it sounds like **gone**, meaning a burden lifted, and again because it sounds like **more**, meaning hope for what is still to come. English Joseph carries neither echo; Hebrew's Yoseph carries both, from two different roots."},{"l":"What you are seeing","t":"At 30:23 Rachel says God hath taken away, asaph, my reproach; at 30:24 she names the child Yoseph, may He add, from yasaph, a different root that merely resembles asaph in sound. The name is explained by the second, add, root explicitly, while the first, taken away, root supplies an additional, unstated echo immediately before it, layering two near-homonymous roots onto one name within two verses."},{"l":"Why translators split","t":"English Joseph is a single transliterated word; it cannot simultaneously echo two different, only sound-alike Hebrew roots the way the birth narrative's two consecutive statements do, so a reader gets both explanations in English prose with no sense that they are doing double, overlapping wordplay on the boy's one name."},{"l":"The rule to carry away","t":"When a name's explanation is preceded immediately by a similar-sounding but etymologically separate statement, check whether the narrative is layering two puns rather than one. Joseph's naming is the clearest case of this doubling in the whole cluster of birth-name puns in these two chapters."},{"l":"Choosing between them","t":"Joseph as the name, and both of Rachel's statements, are not in dispute among translators. What matters is that the layered wordplay, two near-homonymous roots both feeding into one name within two verses, is a Hebrew sound effect no single English name or explanation can reproduce."},{"l":"The word","t":"\u05d9\u05d5\u05b9\u05e1\u05b5\u05e3 Yoseph (\u05d9\u05b8\u05e1\u05b7\u05e3 yasaph, add \/ \u05d0\u05b8\u05e1\u05b7\u05e3 asaph, take away) \u00b7 H3130 \/ H3254 \/ H622"}],"src":["The two consecutive statements: Genesis 30:23-24","The broader birth-naming-pun pattern this doubling belongs to: Genesis 29:32-30:24"]}