Tool Beta

Divine Council Index

Passages where the unseen realm is acting, grouped by thread.

Deuteronomy 32:43; Hebrews 1:6

The end of the Song of Moses, where the Masoretic text is one line and every other witness is longer.

ContestedCosmic geographyDead Sea Scrolls
Deuteronomy 32:43; Hebrews 1:6

Deuteronomy 32:43; Hebrews 1:6, in every translation this tool compares.

First, in plain English

The real question: did later copies of this song lose a line about angels worshiping God, or did earlier copies add one that was never there? Imagine a will with six copies at six law offices. Five include a paragraph. The sixth (the one that became everyone's default) is missing it. That's not proof the paragraph was added later; it could just as easily be the copy that lost something. This card takes the longer reading as original, and the shorter one as the copy that lost a line.

The problem

Hebrews 1:6 quotes a line about all God's angels worshipping the Son and presents it as Scripture. That line is not in the Hebrew text behind the King James or most English Old Testaments.

King James

Rejoice, O ye nations, with his people.

The 1611 translators followed the Hebrew they had, faithfully. The result is that the words Hebrews 1:6 quotes as Scripture are not present in their Deuteronomy. That is the mirror image of the usual argument about verses missing from modern Bibles, running in the opposite direction, and it is the one almost nobody raises.
What this reading resolves

If the longer text is original, Hebrews is quoting Deuteronomy as it stood in the first century, and the chapter lost divine beings at two points rather than one. That also explains why the Song of Moses ends on a cosmic note instead of a national one, which fits how it opened.

What it still does not

The witnesses agree against the Masoretic Text and do not agree with each other. 4QDeut-q calls on all the gods, the Septuagint on the angels of God in most copies and the sons of God in some. Reconstructing one original from three disagreeing witnesses is not the same as having it.

What the alternatives leave open

The strongest reply is that Hebrews 1:6 is quoting Psalm 97:7 rather than Deuteronomy 32:43, and that the sons of God reading in the Greek is a minority one with thin transmission. That reply is serious and it still has to accept that this chapter is shorter in the Masoretic Text than in every other witness at exactly the two places where divine beings would appear.

The edit point

The second minus in the same chapter, and the one that can be checked against a New Testament quotation. The Masoretic Text of verse 43 has a single line, rejoice O nations with his people. 4QDeut-q (4Q44) has a bicolon that adds a call for all the gods to bow down to him. The Septuagint has two bicola and includes the angels of God, with some copies reading sons of God. Justin Martyr quotes the longer Greek form in the second century, word for word as Hebrews has it.

So the pattern in Deuteronomy 32 is not one disputed word. It is heavenly beings absent from the Masoretic Text at verse 8 and again at verse 43, present in the Qumran material and the Greek at both, and quoted from the longer form inside the New Testament itself.

Second Temple witness

4QDeut-q (4Q44), Qumran

Preserves the longer ending of the Song with the call to the gods. Together with 4QDeut-j at verse 8, it is the reason this chapter is the most text-critically important in Deuteronomy.
Beings in this passage
  • {"u":"https:\/\/jayms.com\/bible-study-tools-2\/gods-of-the-bible\/bene-elohim\/","n":"Bene elohim","s":"Sons of God: a group of lesser divine beings who show up at God's throne.","r":"Genesis 6:2"}
  • {"u":"https:\/\/jayms.com\/bible-study-tools-2\/gods-of-the-bible\/angels\/","n":"Angels","s":"A word that means messenger and describes a job, not a species of being.","r":"2 Kings 19:35"}
Sources
  1. 4QDeut-q (4Q44), Qumran
  2. Tov, Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible, 269
  3. Heiser, Bibliotheca Sacra 158 (2001): 52-74
  4. Justin Martyr, quoting the longer Greek form in the second century
  5. The Masoretic-priority reply, that Hebrews 1:6 cites Psalm 97:7: the counter-case, still to be pulled to a named source

All passages

Favorites
Timelines
Command Centers
Search and Lookup
Printables
Facebook X Subscribe