Tool Alpha
The Stoic Reader
Stoic texts read beside the New Testament passages that share their words or their argument, and where the New Testament turns.
Why not a son of God?
Epictetus asks why a man who understands his kinship with God should not call himself a citizen of the world, and a son of God. Paul says those led by the Spirit of God are sons of God.
Romans 8:14, in every translation this tool compares.
The real question: when Epictetus and Paul both call people sons of God, is it the same sonship? Two people both say they are a son of the family firm. One was born into it; the other was adopted. Does it matter how you became the son?
"why may not such a one call himself a citizen of the universe! Why not a son of God? And why shall he fear any thing that happens among men?"
υἱὸς θεοῦ (huios theou), son of God. Epictetus 1.9.6: διὰ τί μὴ υἱὸν τοῦ θεοῦ; why not a son of God? Romans 8:14: οὗτοι υἱοί εἰσιν θεοῦ, these are sons of God. The noun is υἱός (huios), Strong's G5207.
Both draw courage from the sonship. Epictetus's next sentence asks why such a man should fear anything among men, since God is his maker, father and guardian. Paul says the Spirit received is not a spirit of slavery leading back into fear (8:15).
For Epictetus every rational being is God's son by nature: the seeds of being have come down from God to all rational natures, so he should never call himself Athenian or Corinthian (1.9.1-5). For Paul sonship is given: it is the Spirit's leading, a Spirit of adoption by whom we cry Abba, Father (8:15), and it makes the sons heirs with Christ, if they suffer with him (8:17). Epictetus argues from what every man already is. Paul argues from what God has done.
The phrase is shared and the courage it yields is similar. No source in hand says Paul knew this discourse; Wright calls Epictetus Paul's near contemporary. The link is the phrase and a common way of reasoning about kinship with God.
Not a claim that Epictetus believed in the Christian Son of God. The phrase in 1.9 belongs to every person who reasons, which is the opposite of Paul's claim about one Son.
- Epictetus, Discourses 1.9.1-7, Greek text ed. Heinrich Schenkl (Teubner, 1916), Perseus Digital Library (canonical-greekLit)
- Epictetus, Discourses, trans. Thomas Wentworth Higginson (Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1890), 1.9, Perseus Digital Library
- SBL Greek New Testament, Romans 8:14, via MorphGNT
- Site word study data, word-study-alpha.json, G5207
- N. T. Wright, Paul: A Biography (HarperOne), ch. 8, Athens, calling Seneca and Epictetus Paul's near contemporaries
