Series: New Testament Authors · Part 4 of 4
He did not believe during the ministry. Within a few years he was running the Jerusalem church.
Nothing in the New Testament explains that turn except one half-verse, and the half-verse is easy to read past.
Was James Really Jesus’s Brother?
The Gospels say so plainly and the interpretation has been debated for a long time.
Mark 6:3 has the people of Nazareth naming Jesus’s brothers: James, Joses, Judas, and Simon, along with unnamed sisters. Paul refers in Gal 1:19 to James the Lord’s brother, using the ordinary word.
Three readings exist. The plain one takes them as younger children of Mary and Joseph. Another takes them as sons of Joseph by an earlier marriage, which is the older Eastern position. A third takes brother in the broader sense of kinsman and reads them as cousins, which became the standard Western position.
The debate is bound up with the question of Mary’s perpetual virginity and it is not going to be settled by a paragraph. What matters here is that the second and third readings still place James inside Jesus’s family and outside the Twelve, so the point that follows holds on any of them.
Did James Believe in Jesus During the Ministry?
No, and the Gospels are blunt about it.
John 7:5 states that even his own brothers did not believe in him. That is recorded during the ministry, well after the Twelve had been appointed.
Mark 3:21 is harsher still. When Jesus’s family heard what he was doing they went to take charge of him, saying he was out of his mind.
Whatever James became later, that is where he started. A man who thought his brother had lost his senses.
What Changed for James?
1 Cor 15:7, and that is the whole explanation the New Testament offers.
Paul, reciting an early list of resurrection appearances, says that Jesus appeared to James. No narrative, no scene, no dialogue. One clause in a list.
That is all we get, and it sits between a brother who called him mad and a leader of the church in Jerusalem. Whatever happened, the New Testament records it in five words and moves on.
What Did James Do in the Early Church?
He led, and Paul treats his standing as a fact requiring no argument.
Gal 1:19 has Paul, on his first Jerusalem visit after conversion, seeing none of the apostles except Peter and James the Lord’s brother. Gal 2:9 names James, Cephas, and John as those reputed to be pillars, with James first.
Acts 15 is the clearest picture. At the council over whether Gentile converts must keep the law, Peter speaks, Barnabas and Paul report, and then James gives the judgment that shapes the decision. Acts 21:18 has Paul reporting to James on his final Jerusalem visit.
That is a considerable position, and the New Testament shows him holding it without ever explaining how he got it.
Did James Write the Letter of James?
Almost certainly, and the letter’s own reticence is part of the case.
It opens as from James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ. No claim to family relationship. No claim to office. Exactly the restraint you find in Jude, who identifies himself through James rather than through Jesus.
That restraint is difficult to explain in a forgery. Someone writing under a famous name to borrow authority uses the credential. Both of these letters decline to.
The letter was among the disputed books for a time, and it settled into the collection later than some. Luther’s discomfort with it is well known and belongs to a much later argument.
How Did James Die?
Two accounts survive, one early and plain, one later and dramatic.
Josephus reports that the high priest Ananus, taking advantage of the gap between Roman governors, convened a council and had James, described as the brother of Jesus who was called Christ, delivered up to be stoned. Brief, incidental, and in the ordinary idiom of the work.
Hegesippus, writing perhaps a century after the event and surviving only in quotation, gives a far fuller version: James set on the temple parapet to turn the crowd from Jesus, testifying instead, thrown down, stoned while praying for his attackers, and finished with a fuller’s club.
Both agree on a judicial killing in Jerusalem by Jewish authorities before the war. Everything past that point is in the later and more elaborate source, and it has all the features of a martyrdom account.
Why Does James Get Confused With the Apostles?
Because there are three men named James and only one of them has a story.
James son of Zebedee was one of the Twelve, brother of John, beheaded by Herod Agrippa I in AD 44. James son of Alphaeus was also one of the Twelve, and Scripture records nothing about him beyond his name in four lists. James the brother of Jesus was not among the Twelve at all.
The third man has the letter, the council, the pillar status, and the dramatic death. The second man has a blank page. The material migrates in the obvious direction, and popular accounts routinely credit an apostle with a letter he did not write, a council he did not run, and a death that was not his.
Keeping them apart is not pedantry. Merging them erases the one thing that makes James’s story remarkable, which is that he started as an unbeliever.
Part of a series on the New Testament writers who were not among the Twelve.
Sources
Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 20.200. The earliest and plainest account of the death of James. Widely available in translation.
Hegesippus, preserved in Eusebius of Caesarea, Ecclesiastical History 2.23. The fuller martyrdom account. Free in full at the Christian Classics Ethereal Library.
Where the sourcing stops: the argument that the letter’s reticence tells against forgery is a common observation rather than a claim from a named study. The summary of the three positions on the meaning of brother describes a long-running interpretive debate without adjudicating it.
Footnotes
- That the New Testament gives the conversion of James five words in a list, with no scene attached, is remarkable given how much narrative attention Paul’s conversion receives. Whatever happened between Mark 3:21 and Acts 15 was evidently known well enough not to need retelling.
- The three-Jameses problem is the single most common identity error in popular teaching about the apostles, and it runs in a predictable direction. The man with no recorded words inherits the deeds of the man with a letter and a death, because a blank page invites filling.
Continues from Part 3: Who Wrote the Book of Jude? · Start at Part 1: Who Was Luke and Did He Write Acts?
All 4 parts in this series
- Part 1Who Was Luke and Did He Write Acts?
- Part 2Who Was Mark in the New Testament?
- Part 3Who Wrote the Book of Jude?
- Part 4Who Was James the Brother of Jesus?You are here
New field notes when they are ready, along with the research underneath them. No drip sequence, no course, nothing to buy.
